The Influence of Social Studies Learning Using the Questions Students Have and Drill and Practice Learning Methods on Student Learning Outcomes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35719/hrtg.v5i2.157Keywords:
Social Studies Learning, Questions Students Have Method, Drill and Practice Methods, Student Learning OutcomesAbstract
This research seeks to find out if there is a meaningful difference in learning results between students who utilize the Question Student Have method and those who utilize the Drill and Practice method at SMP Negeri 1 Jatisrono. This research is an experimental study employing a randomized pretest-posttest comparison group design. The study's population included grade VIII students from SMP Negeri 1 Jatisrono, with samples taken from two classes, specifically class VIII B and VIII C, chosen through purposive sampling methods. Data gathering was conducted via observation, documentation, pretest, and posttest. Data analysis consisted of prerequisite tests for normality and homogeneity, followed by hypothesis testing using an independent samples t-test. The findings revealed a notable difference in learning outcomes between students using the Question Student Have method and those using the Drill and Practice method. This is shown by the average pretest score of experimental class 1 being 72.51 and experimental class 2 being 68.83. In contrast, posttest data analysis showed the average score of experimental class 1 to be 79.75 and experimental class 2 to be 75.85. Hypothesis testing using the t-test at a significance level of 0.05 yielded a calculated t value > t table (2.93 > 1.99), leading to the acceptance of Ha and rejection of H0. Therefore, it can be concluded that the learning results of students using the Question Student Have method are superior to those of students using the Drill and Practice method.
References
Bonwell, C. C., & Eison, J. A. (1991). Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom. ERIC Clearinghouse on Higher Education.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Harvard University Press.
Chen, X., & Brown, M. (2021). The effect of drill and practice on student learning outcomes in mathematics. Journal of Educational Research, 114(2), 123–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2021.1872332
Chen, Y., & Brown, P. (2021). Enhancing student mastery through drill and practice: A classroom application. Journal of Education and Learning, 10(2), 45–52.
Cui, B., Jiao, W., Gui, S., Li, Y., & Fang, Q. (2025). Innovating physical education with artificial intelligence: A potential approach. Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1490966
Darling-Hammond, L. (2017). Empowered educators: How high-performing systems shape teaching quality around the world. Jossey-Bass.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268.
Gardner, H. (1993). Multiple intelligences: The theory in practice. Basic Books.
Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge. https://www.routledge.com/Visible-Learning/Hattie/p/book/9780415476188
Kellogg, T., & Barker, J. (2022). Exploring the Colgate Model: A Case Study of the Role of Crisis and Risk Communication in Higher Education. Journal of Education and Learning. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1353300.pdf
Kurikulum Merdeka. (2022). Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. Kemdikbud.
Lestari, S., & Andini, R. (2020). Efektivitas metode drill dalam pembelajaran IPS di SMP. Jurnal Pendidikan Sosial, 15(1), 67–76.
Martinez, A., & Lee, J. (2021). Encouraging inquiry through student-generated questions. International Journal of Educational Research, 105, 101724.
Martinez, C. (2022). Developing 21st century teaching skills: A case study of teaching and learning through project-based curriculum. Cogent Education, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2021.2024936
Martinez, R., & Lee, S. (2021). Enhancing critical thinking through student-generated questions in social studies. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 12(1), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.17499/jsser.2021.12.1.3
Ormrod, J. E. (2020). Human learning (8th ed.). Pearson Education.
Piaget, J. (1977). The development of thought: Equilibration of cognitive structures. Viking Press.
Rahmawati, N. (2020). Pengaruh metode drill terhadap hasil belajar IPS siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 12(2), 112–120.
Rogers, C. R. (1983). Freedom to learn for the 80s. Merrill.
Rohman, A., & Hidayati, N. (2022). The effectiveness of lecture method in teaching social studies: A case study in junior high school. Indonesian Journal of Educational Research, 10(2), 89–98. https://doi.org/10.21009/ijer.2022.10.2.05
Sari, D. M. (2021). Penerapan metode Questions Students Have dalam meningkatkan hasil belajar siswa. Jurnal Inovasi Pembelajaran IPS, 4(1), 25–32.
Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22.
Skinner, B. F. (1954). The science of learning and the art of teaching. Harvard Educational Review, 24(2), 86–97.
Slavin, R. E. (2002). Evidence-based education policies: Transforming educational practice and research. Educational Researcher, 31(7), 15–21. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X031007015
Slavin, R. E. (2020). Educational psychology: Theory and practice (12th ed.). Pearson.
Smith, J., Johnson, L., & Brown, K. (2019). The Impact of Thematic Teaching on Student Learning Outcomes. Educational Psychology Review, 36(2), 210–225.
Supardi, Satria, M. R., Oktafiana, S., & Nursa’ban, M. (2021). Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial untuk SMP Kelas VIII. Pusat Perbukuan, Badan Standar, Kurikulum, dan Asesmen Pendidikan, Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1adelgLllFkzm7eN-f6joq7KOpzd8dqVj/view
Supriadi, A. (2022). Implementasi metode Questions Students Have dalam pembelajaran IPS. Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan Sosial, 7(2), 143–150.
Sutrisno, H., & Nugraha, D. (2023). Peran pembelajaran IPS dalam pengembangan karakter dan kesadaran sosial siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Humaniora, 11(1), 34–41.
Tan, T. T. M., & Lee, Y. J. (2022). Building improvised microbial fuel cells: A model integrated STEM curriculum for middle-school learners in Singapore. Education Sciences, 12(6), 417. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12060417
Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st century skills: Learning for life in our times. John Wiley & Sons.
Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge. Harvard University Press.
Wang, H., & Li, Y. (2020). Green technology-enhanced project-based learning for environmental awareness. Journal of Environmental Education, 51(4), 270–285. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2020.1760137
Wang, M. T. (2021). Skill, Thrill, and Will: The Role of Metacognition, Interest, and Self-Control in Predicting Student Engagement in Mathematics Learning Over Time. Child Development, 92(4), 1369–1387. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13531
Wei, L. (2023). Artificial intelligence in language instruction: Impact on English learning achievement, L2 motivation, and self-regulated learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1261955. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1261955
Zaini, M. (2006). Strategi pembelajaran aktif. Andi.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 heritage
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
